<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why does &#8216;rich client&#8217; equal &#8216;bad separation of presentation from content&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/</link>
	<description>From an XML geek, a reader, a writer, a connector, a man of the people (says keep hope alive)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Downey :: Silverfish and Appallingo</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Downey :: Silverfish and Appallingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 15:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s funny how many people are trying to reinvent (own) the Web, with &#8220;rich clients&#8221; (rich vendors) and yet all of them miss the point by a mile. The Web is already great big repository of data. Burring that data inside propriety blobs of eye candy isn&#8217;t any kind of progress. Let&#8217;s continue to keep the style separate from the content, eh? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s funny how many people are trying to reinvent (own) the Web, with &#8220;rich clients&#8221; (rich vendors) and yet all of them miss the point by a mile. The Web is already great big repository of data. Burring that data inside propriety blobs of eye candy isn&#8217;t any kind of progress. Let&#8217;s continue to keep the style separate from the content, eh? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Baker</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/04/30/why-does-rich-client-equal-bad-separation-of-presentation-from-content/#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>You nailed it.  HTML is an improvement on most of those languages in the general case IME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it.  HTML is an improvement on most of those languages in the general case IME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

