<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed readers get namespaces wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/03/15/feed-readers-get-namespaces-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/03/15/feed-readers-get-namespaces-wrong/</link>
	<description>From an XML geek, a reader, a writer, a connector, a man of the people (says keep hope alive)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leftblank</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/03/15/feed-readers-get-namespaces-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>Leftblank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2007/03/15/feed-readers-get-namespaces-wrong/#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Surely a little bit of an disturbing thing, but like you said, as long as it&#039;s &#039;ok&#039; for the human readers, I suppose everything should be fine. I&#039;m personally more waiting for good support of duplicate feed entries; when I read the RSS feed of websites in Thunderbird I usually see a lot of dupes due to minor changes in the content or so, pretty disturbing on sites such as Digg or Gizmodo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely a little bit of an disturbing thing, but like you said, as long as it&#8217;s &#8216;ok&#8217; for the human readers, I suppose everything should be fine. I&#8217;m personally more waiting for good support of duplicate feed entries; when I read the RSS feed of websites in Thunderbird I usually see a lot of dupes due to minor changes in the content or so, pretty disturbing on sites such as Digg or Gizmodo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

