<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infopath and &#8220;Design Once&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/</link>
	<description>From an XML geek, a reader, a writer, a connector, a man of the people (says keep hope alive)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Richards</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Re: XHTML and XForms: 100% correct, though remember that the XML is pretty much free and clear of anything special, other than a couple of PI statements up top letting InfoPath know what template it needs to use for opening the XML, so there should be a super-high level of interop with any other editor that would like to party on the XML data itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: XHTML and XForms: 100% correct, though remember that the XML is pretty much free and clear of anything special, other than a couple of PI statements up top letting InfoPath know what template it needs to use for opening the XML, so there should be a super-high level of interop with any other editor that would like to party on the XML data itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdubinko</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>mdubinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I have zero data here, but based on past experience, I&#039;d say it&#039;s about 99.99% sure it doesn&#039;t support XForms. -m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have zero data here, but based on past experience, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s about 99.99% sure it doesn&#8217;t support XForms. -m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Sethi</title>
		<link>http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Sethi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dubinko.info/blog/2006/06/06/infopath-and-design-once/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hi 

Infopath as part of Office 2003 was not XHTML or Xforms compliant.  I know a lot of people are looking to implement Xforms because its part of the new XHTML 2 standard but shy away from Infopath because of its non-compliance. 

Do you know if Infopath has now become Xforms 1.0 compliant? I suppose I really should ask someone in Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>Infopath as part of Office 2003 was not XHTML or Xforms compliant.  I know a lot of people are looking to implement Xforms because its part of the new XHTML 2 standard but shy away from Infopath because of its non-compliance. </p>
<p>Do you know if Infopath has now become Xforms 1.0 compliant? I suppose I really should ask someone in Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
